Risk and protective factors of LGBTQ+ identity abuse in romantic relationships: a scoping review

Spooner, R., Cleveland, M., Pereira, A., Sharpe, B. T., Newman, H. and Canessa-Pollard, V. (2026) Risk and protective factors of LGBTQ+ identity abuse in romantic relationships: a scoping review. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse. pp. 1-16. ISSN 1552-8324

[thumbnail of Spooner, R. et al, Risk and protective factors of LGBTQ+ identity abuse in romantic relationships: a scoping review, Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, pp. 1-16. Copyright © The Author(s) 2026. Reprinted by permission of SAGE Publications.] Text (Spooner, R. et al, Risk and protective factors of LGBTQ+ identity abuse in romantic relationships: a scoping review, Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, pp. 1-16. Copyright © The Author(s) 2026. Reprinted by permission of SAGE Publications.)
ScopingReview_ Anonymous_V3_Comments Addressed - Copy.docx - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (115kB)
[thumbnail of Spooner, R. et al, Risk and protective factors of LGBTQ+ identity abuse in romantic relationships: a scoping review, Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, pp. 1-16. Copyright © The Author(s) 2026. Reprinted by permission of SAGE Publications.] Text (Spooner, R. et al, Risk and protective factors of LGBTQ+ identity abuse in romantic relationships: a scoping review, Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, pp. 1-16. Copyright © The Author(s) 2026. Reprinted by permission of SAGE Publications.)
Tables_V3 .docx - Supplemental Material
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (23kB)

Abstract

Identity abuse (IA) is a form of domestic abuse (DA) seen in LGBTQ+ romantic relationships, which weaponizes a partner’s gender or sexual identity against them. This scoping review had the primary aim of identifying risk and protective factors of LGBTQ+ IA in romantic relationships. The secondary aim was to determine the prevalence of specific IA tactics (Outing, Isolation from LGBTQ+ Community, Derogatory Language, Belittling Identity). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines were followed. Search terms focused on LGBTQ+ identities and DA. A total of 8,918 papers were retrieved across three databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycInfo), with 41 papers meeting
the inclusion criteria. Both qualitative and quantitative papers were included in this review. The review identified multiple risk factors for IA perpetration and victimization, such as LGBTQ+ enacted stigma, specific gender expressions, and mental illness. Identifying the prevalence of IA tactics specifically was difficult to determine due to measurement differences. Across
21 quantitative papers, outing was the most reported tactic, being reported in 73.91% of the papers. Overall, the review highlights the field of IA as being under-researched. The synthesis of literature that the review provides is a crucial step to understand and develop IA as a theoretical concept and provides direct recommendations for future research.

Publication Type: Articles
Uncontrolled Keywords: identity abuse, queer relationships, LGBTQ+ domestic abuse, sexuality victimization, transgender victimization
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
H Social Sciences > HQ The family. Marriage. Women > HQ12 Sexual life > HQ19 Sexual behaviour and attitudes. Sexuality
K Law > K Law (General)
K Law > K5000 Criminal law and procedure
Divisions: Academic Areas > Institute of Education, Social and Life Sciences > Psychology
Research Entities > POWER Centre
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Rylee Spooner
Date Deposited: 20 May 2026 08:24
Last Modified: 20 May 2026 08:24
URI: https://eprints.chi.ac.uk/id/eprint/8602

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item
▲ Top

Our address

I’m looking for