Testing the validity of 360-video for analysing visual exploratory activity in soccer

Feist, J., Datson, N., Runswick, O. R. and Pocock, C. (2025) Testing the validity of 360-video for analysing visual exploratory activity in soccer. Journal of Sport Sciences. pp. 1-14. ISSN 1466-447X

[thumbnail of This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in  Journal of Sport Sciences on 30 October 2025 available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2580838] Text (This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Sport Sciences on 30 October 2025 available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2580838)
Feist et al. (2025) VEA 360-video with author details - ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 30 October 2026.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0.

Download (905kB) | Request a copy
[thumbnail of This is an article published by Taylor & Francis in  Journal of Sport Sciences on 30 October 2025 available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2580838]
Preview
Text (This is an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Sport Sciences on 30 October 2025 available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2580838)
Testing the validity of 360-video for analysing visual exploratory activity in soccer.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0.

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

Extended reality (XR) technologies present new opportunities to measure sports performance in 34 immersive, representative environments. This study aimed to i) assess the construct and face validity 35 of a 360-video simulation for capturing visual exploratory activity (VEA) in women’s soccer and ii) 36 understand players’ perceptions of acceptability and tolerability of the simulation. Eleven sub-elite 37 women’s soccer players and eleven novices viewed 40 soccer videos in a head-mounted display. 38 Footage was recorded using a stationary GoPro 360 Max camera at eye height in six pitch locations. 39 Participants verbalised and acted out an action response. VEA was measured by the number of ‘scans’ 40 away from the ball before it reached the 360-video camera. Participants answered open-ended 41 questions on acceptability, physical fidelity, and tolerability. Mann-Whitney U tests compared scan 42 frequency and actions per trial between the two groups. Results supported construct and face validity, 43 with good acceptability, tolerability, and physical fidelity. Soccer players (Mdn = 0.31 scans/s) had 44 significantly higher scan frequencies than novices (Mdn = 0.06 scans/s, p < 0.001) and generated 45 significantly more detailed responses per trial (p < 0.001). 360-video offers a valid, acceptable method 46 for capturing VEA. Future work should assess its efficacy for skill development.

Publication Type: Articles
Uncontrolled Keywords: immersive, scan frequency, women's football, visual perception, virtual reality, simulation
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GV Recreation Leisure > GV557 Sports
G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GV Recreation Leisure > GV557 Sports > GV711 Coaching
Divisions: Academic Areas > Institute of Sport > Area > Sport and Exercise Psychology and Research Methods
Academic Areas > Institute of Sport > Research Theme > Enhancing Sport Performance
Research Entities > Centre for Health and Allied Sport and Exercise Science Research (CHASER)
Depositing User: James Feist
Date Deposited: 11 Nov 2025 15:33
Last Modified: 11 Nov 2025 15:33
URI: https://eprints.chi.ac.uk/id/eprint/8322

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item
▲ Top

Our address

I’m looking for