The Validity of Hawkin Dynamics Wireless Dual Force Plates for Measuring Countermovement Jump and Drop Jump Variables

Badby, A. J., Mundy, P. D., Comfort, P., Lake, J. P. and McMahon, J. J. (2023) The Validity of Hawkin Dynamics Wireless Dual Force Plates for Measuring Countermovement Jump and Drop Jump Variables. Sensors, 23 (10). pp. 1-15. ISSN 1424-8220

[thumbnail of Copyright: © 2023 by the authors. Badby, A.J.; Mundy, P.D. et al. The Validity of Hawkin Dynamics Wireless Dual Force Plates for Measuring Countermovement Jump and Drop Jump Variables. Sensors 2023, 23, 4820. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23104820]
Preview
Text (Copyright: © 2023 by the authors. Badby, A.J.; Mundy, P.D. et al. The Validity of Hawkin Dynamics Wireless Dual Force Plates for Measuring Countermovement Jump and Drop Jump Variables. Sensors 2023, 23, 4820. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23104820)
The validity of Hawkins Dynamics wireles dual force plates for measuring.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Force plate testing is becoming more commonplace in sport due to the advent of commercially available, portable, and affordable force plate systems (i.e., hardware and software). Following the validation of the Hawkin Dynamics Inc. (HD) proprietary software in recent literature, the aim of this study was to determine the concurrent validity of the HD wireless dual force plate hardware for assessing vertical jumps. During a single testing session, the HD force plates were placed directly atop two adjacent Advanced Mechanical Technology Inc. in-ground force plates (the “gold standard”) to simultaneously collect vertical ground reaction forces produced by 20 participants (27 ± 6 years, 85 ± 14 kg, 176.5 ± 9.23 cm) during the countermovement jump (CMJ) and drop jump (DJ) tests (1000 Hz). Agreement between force plate systems was determined via ordinary least products regression using bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals. No bias was present between the two force plate systems for any of the CMJ and DJ variables, except DJ peak braking force (proportional bias) and DJ peak braking power (fixed and proportional bias). The HD system may be considered a valid alternative to the industry gold standard for assessing vertical jumps because fixed or proportional bias was identified for none of the CMJ variables (n = 17) and only 2 out of 18 DJ variables.

Publication Type: Articles
Additional Information: Special Issue Biosensors for Gait Measurements and Patient Rehabilitation
Uncontrolled Keywords: Wireless dual force plate system; force–time; vertical jump; hardware; concurrent validity; agreement; accuracy
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GV Recreation Leisure > GV557 Sports
G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GV Recreation Leisure > GV557 Sports > GV711 Coaching
Q Science > QM Human anatomy
Q Science > QP Physiology
T Technology > T Technology (General)
Divisions: Academic Areas > Institute of Sport > Area > Exercise Physiology
SWORD Depositor: Publications Router Jisc
Depositing User: Publications Router Jisc
Date Deposited: 06 Jun 2023 13:42
Last Modified: 06 Jun 2023 13:42
URI: https://eprints.chi.ac.uk/id/eprint/6878

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item
▲ Top

Our address

I’m looking for